NEW MODELS OF HIGHER EDUCATION: A QUALITATIVE STUDY ON FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF ABC

Volume 4, Issue 1, February 2019     |     PP. 1-17      |     PDF (218 K)    |     Pub. Date: March 20, 2019
DOI:    346 Downloads     7133 Views  

Author(s)

Manuel Tavares, PhD Postgraduate Program in Education, Nove de Julho University (UNINOVE), São Paulo, Brazil
Sandra Gomes, PhD Student Postgraduate Program in Education, Nove de Julho University (UNINOVE), São Paulo, Brazil

Abstract
In the formerly so-called third world countries, now called emerging countries and or peripheral and semi-peripheral countries, there are innovative counter-hegemonic experiences whose higher education projects are situated in a perspective of social equity and justice including historically marginalized social groups and away from the right to higher education. The present text intends to reveal and reflect on the institutional structure that underpins a new model of higher education in Brazil, particularly at the Federal University of ABC (UFABC). The democratization processes of the countries, accompanied by policies aimed at investing in new institutions of higher education, allowed a considerable diversity with regard to the new student publics. Universities, traditionally reserved for elites, have opened up to new students, both in terms of gender, ethnicity, social class, and even of different generations. This opening created challenges and expectations regarding the democratization of higher education, the inclusion of cultural and epistemological diversity, the promotion of interculturality and the decolonization of power and knowledge relations. Some institutional experimentation policies merit particular reference. In Brazil, the actions of the post-neoliberal governments of Lula and Dilma also focused on the creation of popular universities, presenting different profiles and responding to specific objectives of political action. The first one was the Federal University of ABC (UFABC), whose institutional matrix is the object of our study. We will focus first on qualitative documentary research using discourse analysis from N. Fairclough's perspective (2001) in order to infer the structuring lines of the new model of higher education with a specific focus on the conceptual foundations, in the pedagogical model and in the principles governing pedagogical practice. As a new model of higher education that promotes interdisciplinarity, the social inclusion, cultural and epistemological diversity in view of the promotion of cognitive justice, we intend to know the epistemological foundations that support the institutional matrix of the Federal University of ABC and that regulate all the academic activity of the institution and its relations with society. One of the conclusions of the study points to the existence of some contradictions between discourses and practices.

Keywords
Conceptual fundamentals; Pedagogical model; university education; Counter-hegemonic higher education

Cite this paper
Manuel Tavares, Sandra Gomes, NEW MODELS OF HIGHER EDUCATION: A QUALITATIVE STUDY ON FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF ABC , SCIREA Journal of Education. Volume 4, Issue 1, February 2019 | PP. 1-17.

References

[ 1 ] Arnove, R. F., Franz; S., Molis, M.; Torres, C. A. (2003) Education in Latin America. Dependency, underdevelopment, and inequality. In R. F. Arnove; C. A. Torres (Eds.). Comparative Education: The Dialetic of the Global and the Local (pp. 313-337). Laham, LD: Rowman & Littlefield.
[ 2 ] Ball, S.J. (1990). Politics and policy making in education: explorations in policy sociology. Nova York: Routledge.
[ 3 ] Ball, S.J. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse, London, v. 13, n. 2, p. 10-17.
[ 4 ] Dias Sobrinho, J. (2012). Acreditación en América Latina: crisis de la educación superior y distintas fases de la calidad. In Muños, V. M. R. et all. La acreditación de la educación superior en Iberoamérica. La gestión de la calidad de los programas educativos. Tensiones, desencuentros, conflictos y resultados. Bloomington: Red de Académicos de Ibero-América.
[ 5 ] Espinoza, E. (2002). The Global and the National Rhetoric of Educational Reform and the Practice of (In) equity in the Chilean Higher Education System, 1981-1998.
[ 6 ] Fairclough, N. (2001). Discurso e mudança social. Brasília: Editora da Universidade de Brasília (UNB).
[ 7 ] Fernandez Lamarra (2010) N. Hacia una nueva agenda de la educación superior en América Latina. Mexico, DF: ANUIES.
[ 8 ] Gazzola, A. L.; Didriksson, A. (Eds) (2008). Trends in Higher Education in Latin America and the Caribbean. Caracas: IESALC-UNESCO.
[ 9 ] Mignolo, W. (2010). Desobediência Epistémica: Retórica de La Modernidad, lógica de La colonialidad y gramática de la descolonialidad. Buenos Aires: Ediciones del Signo.
[ 10 ] Mignolo, W. (2003). Histórias locais, projetos globais. Colonialidade, saberes subalternos e pensamento liminar. Belo Horizonte: UFMG.
[ 11 ] Olssen, M.; Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: from the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20 (3), pp. 313-345.
[ 12 ] PDI (2013) - Plano de Desenvolvimento Institucional da UFABC 2013-2022. Documento institucional. Santo André: UFABC.
[ 13 ] Quijano, A. (2009). Colonialidade do poder e classificação social. In Santos, B. S.; Meneses, M. P. (Org.). Epistemologias do Sul (73-117). Porto: Edições Afrontamento.
[ 14 ] Quijano, A. (2005). Colonialidade do poder, eurocentrismo e América Latina. In Lander, Edgardo (Org.). A colonialidade do saber: eurocentrismo e ciências sociais. Perspectivas latino-americanas.Colección Sur Sur, Argentina: Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires – CLACSO, (227-278). Available in: http://www.geografia.fflch.usp.br/graduacao/apoio/Apoio/Apoio_Tonico/2s2012/Texto_1.pdf Access date: February, 2016.
[ 15 ] Rivera, S. (2010). Oprimidos pero no vencidos. La Paz: La mirada Salvaje.
[ 16 ] Sader, E. (org). (2013). Dez Anos de Governos Pós-Neoliberais: Lula e Dilma. São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial/FLACSO Brasil.
[ 17 ] Santos, B. de S; Meneses, M. P. (2009). Epistemologias do Sul. Coimbra: Almedina.
[ 18 ] Santos, B. de S. (2001). Crítica da razão indolente. Contra o desperdício da experiência. Porto: Edições Afrontamento.
[ 19 ] Santos, B. de S. (2004). A gramática do tempo. Porto: Edições Afrontamento.
[ 20 ] Santos, B. de S.; Almeida Filho, N. (2008). A Universidade do Século XXI. Para uma Universidade Nova. Coimbra: Almedina.
[ 21 ] Teodoro, A., Mendizábal Cabrera, C. H., Lourenço, F.; Villegas Roca, M. (Org.) (2013) Interculturalidad y educación superior. Desafios de la diversidade para un cambio educativo. Buenos Aires: Editorial Biblos.
[ 22 ] Torres, C. A. (2011). Public universities and the neoliberal common sense: seven iconoclastic theses. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 21(3),177-197.
[ 23 ] Tuckmann, B. W. (2002). Manual de investigação em educação. Lisboa: FCG.
[ 24 ] Tunnerman B., C.; Chauí, M. S. (2008). Desafios da Universidade na Sociedade do Conhecimento. UNESCO Forum Occasional Papers Series. Brasília: UNESCO Brasil. Available in http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001344/134422por.pdf Acess data: 18/02/2017.
[ 25 ] Walsh, C. (2012). Interculturalidad y (de) colonialidad. Perspectivas críticas y políticas. Visão Global, Joaçaba, v. 15, n. 1-2, p. 61-74, jan./dez.
[ 26 ] Walsh, C. (2013). Pedagogías decoloniales. Prácticas insurgentes de resistir, (re) existir y (re) vivir. Quito: Catherine Walsh, editora.